[Cryptography] Binary security (was The Laws of secure information systems design)

Rick Smith, Cryptosmith me at cys.me
Sat Jul 16 14:13:58 EDT 2016


It’s pointless to write a principle or “law” or whatever claiming “Security is binary."

If the meaning of of a pithy principal isn’t blatantly obvious from its text, it’s badly worded.

A handful of us have had the dubious distinction of working with “formal proofs of security” in which security is considered a binary state. The trick is to define security so narrowly that it is a binary condition that is also provable. You throw out a lot of threats when you do this. The answer to “Is it secure” becomes “Yes, but..” and you have to explain all the exceptions and conditions.

Rick.



More information about the cryptography mailing list