[Cryptography] Photojournalists & filmmakers want cameras, to be encrypted

[Steve Furlong]

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Joshua Marpet <
joshua.marpet at guardedrisk.com> wrote:
> Issues:
> 1. Unauthorized editing of video or stills
> 2. Pressure, ranging to duress, to delete stills or video
> 3. Pressure, ranging to duress, to view stills or video
> 4. Unauthorized recording of information - Example - I don't want precise
location tags on a pic, to protect a source, but the camera does so without
my consent or knowledge.
> 5. Verifiably "correct" stills or video - I know this content has not
been altered. (Different from #1, unauthorized editing, in that #1 is more
about access control, and this is more about forensic verifiability)

6. Being able to prove you have no encrypted data.
7. Being unable to prove you have no encrypted data.
8. Surreptitious viewing of your data, such as when your camera is in
custody whether or not you are.
9. Surreptitious deletion of your data.

-- 
Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet. -- Arnaud-Amaury, 1209
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20161224/6b150518/attachment.html>