dave at horsfall.org
Fri Mar 20 21:14:15 EDT 2015
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015, Ray Dillinger wrote:
> The only circumstance in which an adjective is needed is in describing
> partial forward secrecy - and in that case the 'default' form of forward
> secrecy still needs no adjective.
How about Full Forward Secrecy? Heck, you could abbreviate it as "FFS",
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."
http://www.horsfall.org/spam.html (and check the home page whilst you're there)
More information about the cryptography