[Cryptography] Best AES candidate broken
EddyHawk
quarsicon at yahoo.com
Mon Jul 6 06:30:07 EDT 2015
Dear Jerry,
--------------------------------------------
On Sun, 7/5/15, Jerry Leichter <leichter at lrw.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [Cryptography] Best AES candidate broken
To: "Ryan Carboni" <ryacko at gmail.com>
Cc: "Crypto" <cryptography at metzdowd.com>
Date: Sunday, July 5, 2015, 11:01 AM
On Jul 4,
2015, at 4:23 PM, Ryan Carboni <ryacko at gmail.com>
wrote:
fastest on software,
and faster than Rijndael on
hardware
Given that the criteria were a
mix of security and performance, if it didn't make it to
the final 5 and was the fastest, it must have been dinged on
security.
While there's plenty discussion of the 5
algorithms that made it to the final round, I haven't
been able to find anything on why the remaining 10,
including Crypton, the subject of the paper at hand, were
rejected.
Also, this one:
http://csrc.nist.gov/archive/aes/round1/r1report.htm
Best regards,
EddyHawk
More information about the cryptography
mailing list