[Cryptography] Best AES candidate broken

EddyHawk quarsicon at yahoo.com
Mon Jul 6 06:30:07 EDT 2015


Dear Jerry,
--------------------------------------------
On Sun, 7/5/15, Jerry Leichter <leichter at lrw.com> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [Cryptography] Best AES candidate broken
 To: "Ryan Carboni" <ryacko at gmail.com>
 Cc: "Crypto" <cryptography at metzdowd.com>
 Date: Sunday, July 5, 2015, 11:01 AM
 
 On Jul 4,
 2015, at 4:23 PM, Ryan Carboni <ryacko at gmail.com>
 wrote:
  fastest on software,
  and faster than Rijndael on
  hardware

 Given that the criteria were a
 mix of security and performance, if it didn't make it to
 the final 5 and was the fastest, it must have been dinged on
 security.
 While there's plenty discussion of the 5
 algorithms that made it to the final round, I haven't
 been able to find anything on why the remaining 10,
 including Crypton, the subject of the paper at hand, were
 rejected.

Also, this one:
http://csrc.nist.gov/archive/aes/round1/r1report.htm

Best regards,
EddyHawk


More information about the cryptography mailing list