[Cryptography] traffic analysis

Richard Outerbridge outer at sympatico.ca
Thu Jan 29 20:35:25 EST 2015


On 2015-01-29 (29), at 11:22:14, ianG <iang at iang.org> wrote:

[….]

>> Which as we all know is pretty much impossible.
> 
> That I don't follow.
> 
> iang
> 

Maybe things have changed. I’ve always thought in principle
it is impossible to achieve insignificant (for some epsilon
of significance) levels of false positives & false negatives
at the same time with the same level of insignificance. No?
__outer



More information about the cryptography mailing list