[Cryptography] 3DES security?

Scott Kelly scott at hyperthought.com
Thu Aug 27 09:10:58 EDT 2015


On Aug 26, 2015, at 5:36 PM, Derek Atkins <derek at ihtfp.com> wrote:

> Henry,
> 
> On Wed, August 26, 2015 8:07 pm, Henry Baker wrote:
>> What's the current best estimate for the (in)security of 3DES, in bits ?
> 
> 2-key or 3-key 3DES?  Generally 3DES implies 2-key EDE, which equates to
> 112-bit security.  3-Key 3DES uses more key bits, but my recollection is
> that it doesn't significantly increase the security..  So I would treat
> 3DES as 112-bit security.  To date, the best known attack against DES is
> brute force.
> 

There are at least two other known attacks: meet in the middle, and related keys. These are described in RFC4772 and elsewhere. One of the MITM attacks (by Lucks) reduces the strength to 108 bits.


> The REAL issue with 3DES is that it's still only a 64-bit block size so
> you have a 1 in 2^64 chance of randomly guessing the mapping from a
> plaintext block to a cipher block, regardless of the keys.  Of course you
> need to repeat this mapping on every block, so it doesn't necessarily buy
> you anything.
> 
> -derek
> 
> -- 
>       Derek Atkins                 617-623-3745
>       derek at ihtfp.com             www.ihtfp.com
>       Computer and Internet Security Consultant
> 
> _______________________________________________
> The cryptography mailing list
> cryptography at metzdowd.com
> http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography



More information about the cryptography mailing list