[Cryptography] [FORGED] Re: SHA-3 FIPS-202: no SHAKE512 but SHAKE128; confusing SHAKE security

[Peter Gutmann]

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill at hallambaker.com> writes:

>It is not clear to me what 'Binary RSA Myopia' might be or why it would be
>appropriate to use such language.

It's what's more usually called crypto numerology, I'm not sure where "binary
RSA myopia" came from (it's an apt enough name, but doesn't cover other uses,
e.g. with DH or DSA).

Peter.