[Cryptography] Creating a Parallelizeable Cryptographic Hash Function

Kyle Creyts kyle.creyts at gmail.com
Tue Oct 7 11:31:36 EDT 2014

however, it does wind up distributing knowledge.

On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Ben Laurie <benl at google.com> wrote:
> On 6 October 2014 23:23, Bill Cox <waywardgeek at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Ben Laurie <benl at google.com> wrote:
>>> However, this is not a good way to go about designing crypto primitives.
>> I disagree with this point.  This thread is an excellent way for people to
>> *avoid* mistakes like this hash function.  People should be *encouraged* to
>> post their latest dumb idea about hashing here, so it can be reviewed before
>> harming anyone.
> Sure thing, but that's not what I meant. What I meant was that
> starting with a dumb idea, then incrementally fixing things people
> point out is not likely to lead to something good.
> _______________________________________________
> The cryptography mailing list
> cryptography at metzdowd.com
> http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

Kyle Creyts

Information Assurance Professional
Founder BSidesDetroit

More information about the cryptography mailing list