[Cryptography] Third amendment crypto defenses

[Tom Mitchell]

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Tom Mitchell <mitch at niftyegg.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Henry Baker <hbaker1 at pipeline.com> wrote:
>
>> At 11:46 AM 11/7/2014, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
>> >No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without
>> >the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be
>> >prescribed by law.
>
>
..........
>
> So a couple of weeks ago, I wrote about a Third Amendment case from Nevada
> in which a family's home was literally seized and occupied by police
> seeking a vantage point over their neighbor's home.
>

The family home in Nevada situation...
http://www.courthousenews.com/2013/07/03/59061.htm

 But how does cryptography address what appears to be a problem?

The only thing I can think of is continuous encrypted video transmission to
a
disconnected storage device (near or far).   Encrypted so your private
moments
are still private... and perhaps to prove ownership province.   The key
holder
does need to survive.


-- 
  T o m    M i t c h e l l
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20141107/1ce2626a/attachment.html>