[Cryptography] Conferences, committees, compliance
Arnold Reinhold
agr at me.com
Mon Jan 20 06:23:27 EST 2014
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 19, 2014, at 9:54 PM, "James A. Donald" <jamesd at echeque.com> wrote:
> On 2014-01-20 08:47, Arnold Reinhold wrote:
> > If new cryptography is going to have any chance roll back the mass
> > surveillance state, it will have to make its way into commercial
> > use.
>
> IETF committees are owned by the surveillance state. Have to be
> bypassed.
>
> Your argument amounts to saying that only NSA approved software is
> going to get broad acceptance. I think more likely the other way
> around.
>
You may be right, but perhaps others see things differently. Shouldn't they be encouraged to try? Restoring a proper privacy balance between the state and the people won't be easy and it is too soon to surrender on the committee front.
Arnold Reinhold
More information about the cryptography
mailing list