[Cryptography] defaults, black boxes, APIs, and other engineering thoughts

Marshall Clow mclow.lists at gmail.com
Mon Jan 6 20:07:04 EST 2014


On Jan 6, 2014, at 1:01 PM, Jonathan Thornburg <jthorn at astro.indiana.edu> wrote:

> Right now some compilers have skeleton support for these:
> * llvm and gcc implement AddressSanitizer for {x86,x86-64}, but is this
>  production-ready?

Yes, and it is in use in many development projects.

	http://blog.llvm.org/2013/03/testing-libc-with-address-sanitizer.html
	https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Building_Firefox_with_Address_Sanitizer
	http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2013/04/17/using-gccs-4-8-0-address-sanitizer-with-qt/
	http://blogs.perl.org/users/rurban/2012/03/address-sanitizer-round-2.html

— Marshall
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20140106/d40ebd0d/attachment.html>


More information about the cryptography mailing list