[Cryptography] defaults, black boxes, APIs, and other engineering thoughts
Marshall Clow
mclow.lists at gmail.com
Mon Jan 6 20:07:04 EST 2014
On Jan 6, 2014, at 1:01 PM, Jonathan Thornburg <jthorn at astro.indiana.edu> wrote:
> Right now some compilers have skeleton support for these:
> * llvm and gcc implement AddressSanitizer for {x86,x86-64}, but is this
> production-ready?
Yes, and it is in use in many development projects.
http://blog.llvm.org/2013/03/testing-libc-with-address-sanitizer.html
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Building_Firefox_with_Address_Sanitizer
http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2013/04/17/using-gccs-4-8-0-address-sanitizer-with-qt/
http://blogs.perl.org/users/rurban/2012/03/address-sanitizer-round-2.html
— Marshall
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20140106/d40ebd0d/attachment.html>
More information about the cryptography
mailing list