[Cryptography] It's all K&R's fault

Sandy Harris sandyinchina at gmail.com
Mon Apr 21 17:57:23 EDT 2014


Jonathan Thornburg <jthorn at astro.indiana.edu> wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 08:18:18PM -0700, Bill Frantz wrote:

>> And encrypted swap is really the sweet spot for encryption because
>> all the key management problems just go away:
> [[...]]
>
> For anyone who hasn't read them, the paper/slides describing OpenBSD's
> swap encryption (which has been turned *on* in the default install
> since ~2000) make interesting reading:
>   http://www.openbsd.org/papers/swapencrypt.pdf
>   http://www.openbsd.org/papers/swapencrypt-slides.pdf

Do we need swap on current systems? Both server and desktop
boxes now have gigabytes of RAM and I suspect that phones
and such do not have enough or fast enough storage to make
swap very useful. Why not just use an OS that does not swap?


More information about the cryptography mailing list