[Cryptography] Moving forward on improving HTTP's security

Tony Arcieri bascule at gmail.com
Thu Nov 14 14:50:33 EST 2013


On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Greg <greg at kinostudios.com> wrote:
>
> The basics would be to not use the CAs. Working on rest of details,
> they're mostly finished, just gotta make 'em nice 'n pretty. And some code
> would be good, too.
>

And what of other solutions like CT or Tack?

Given Google's power to influence change via Chrome and its share of the
browser market, I think we'll see CT as the the primary solution for what
ails the existing PKI.

Tack looks cool too and I like Trevor and Moxie. But they don't have the
sort of influence Google does unfortunately.

-- 
Tony Arcieri
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20131114/3d68878d/attachment.html>


More information about the cryptography mailing list