once more, with feeling.

Arshad Noor arshad.noor at strongauth.com
Mon Sep 8 15:39:41 EDT 2008


Paul Hoffman wrote:
> 
> A less extreme solution would be to make the warning the user sees on a 
> mixed-content page more insulting to the bank. "This page contains both 
> encrypted and non-encrypted content and is inherently insecure. The 
> owner of this web site has clearly made a very poor security decision in 
> showing this page to you. It is likely that other pages on this site 
> also have similarly poor security. Knowing this, do you wish to continue 
> anyway?"
> 

A more optimal solution is to have this vulnerability accepted by
the OWASP community as a "Top 10" security vulnerability; it will
have the appropriate intended effect since mitigation to the OWASP
defined vulnerabilities is required in PCI-DSS:

"6.5 Develop all web applications based on secure coding guidelines
such as the Open Web Application Security Project guidelines"

https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/security_standards/pci_dss_download.html
http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Top_10_2007

Arshad Noor
StrongAuth, Inc.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo at metzdowd.com



More information about the cryptography mailing list