The need for off-line communication [was: Re: 307 digit number factored]
StealthMonger
StealthMonger at hod.aarg.net
Mon May 28 08:56:54 EDT 2007
Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn at garlic.com> writes:
> ... [lengthy discussion about why on-line communication is better
> than off-line for strangers becoming introduced to one another] ...
That may well be, but no claim was made that off-line communication is
as efficient as on-line for introducing and certifying strangers to
one another. It was only claimed that players who have to remain
geographically hidden would lose their protection if deprived of
off-line communication. This is because in the on-line, low-latency
case, an attacker can locate the end-points through traffic analysis.
Only off-line does the option exist of untraceable traffic mixing such
as remailer chains.
This subject is on-topic here because cryptography is an indispensable
ingredient of these untraceable traffic mixes.
-- StealthMonger
<StealthMonger at nym.alias.net>
<StealthMonger at hod.aarg.net>
<StealthMonger at nym.panta-rhei.eu.org>
--
stealthmail: Scripts to hide whether you're doing email, or when,
or with whom. http://stealthsuite.afflictions.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo at metzdowd.com
More information about the cryptography
mailing list