GnuTLS (libgrypt really) and Postfix
Werner Koch
wk at gnupg.org
Tue Feb 14 16:08:30 EST 2006
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:00:33 -0500, Steven M Bellovin said:
> Let me suggest a C-compatible possibility: pass an extra parameter to
> the library routines, specifying a procedure to call if serious errors
> occur. If that pointer is null, the library can abort.
I agree. However the case at hand is a bit different. I can't
imagine how any application or upper layer will be able to recover
from that error (ENOENT when opening /dev/random). Okay, the special
file might just be missing and a mknod would fix that ;-). Is it the
duty of an application to fix an incomplete installation - how long
shall this be taken - this is not the Unix philosophy.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo at metzdowd.com
More information about the cryptography
mailing list