[smb at cs.columbia.edu: Skype security evaluation]

Marcel Popescu Marcel_Popescu at microbilt.com
Thu Nov 3 10:34:33 EST 2005


> From: owner-cryptography at metzdowd.com [mailto:owner-
> cryptography at metzdowd.com] On Behalf Of Peter Gutmann

> I can't understand why they didn't just use TLS for the handshake (maybe
> YASSL) and IPsec sliding-window + ESP for the transport (there's a free
> minimal implementation of this whose name escapes me for use by people who
> want to avoid the IKE nightmare).  Established, proven protocols and
> implementations are there for the taking, but instead they had to go out
> and try and assemble something with their own three hands (sigh).

Do you have some articles about these protocols? I can't find anything on
your webpage, and a newbie (like myself) can't distinguish between well
designed and badly designed protocols. Can you recommend such a collection
of well designed protocols for various purposes? With implementation caveats
if possible?

(I haven't looked at it in a long time - is Handbook of Applied Cryptography
a good reference for this?)

Thanks,
Marcel


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.7/155 - Release Date: 11/1/2005
 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo at metzdowd.com



More information about the cryptography mailing list