He Pushed the Hot Button of Touch-Screen Voting

[R. A. Hettinga]

<http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/15/politics/15vote.html?pagewanted=print&position=>

The New York Times

June 15, 2004

He Pushed the Hot Button of Touch-Screen Voting
By KATHARINE Q. SEELYE

Kevin Shelley is a big and voluble Irish politician, the son of a former
San Francisco mayor, and not the sort you would figure for the heretofore
semi-obscure job of California secretary of state. But Mr. Shelley, who was
elected to the post in November 2002 after a career as a state legislator,
has adapted the job to suit his style, taking the arcane matter of voting
machines and turning it into a hobbyhorse that some predict he could ride
to the governor's office.

Mr. Shelley, a Democrat, has gained national notice for his skepticism
toward touch-screen voting and his insistence that voters be able to look
at a paper record inside the voting booth to verify their ballots. He says
such paper trails are crucial if government wants voters to have confidence
that their ballots are being counted correctly.

As a result, he has ordered that after July 1, 2005, no county in
California can buy a touch-screen system without a paper record that is
verifiable by the voter, and as of July 2006, all touch-screen systems here
must be equipped with paper trails, regardless of when they were bought.
Until the machines have that capability, he wants people who do not trust
them to have the option of voting by a traditional paper ballot.

Then, on April 30, he banned the use of certain touch screens in 4 counties
and decertified them in 10 other counties until additional security
measures could be put in place.

 "Someone said to me, 'The problem with Kevin Shelley is, he's an
activist,' " Mr. Shelley recalled in an interview earlier this month in his
office here overlooking the black-and-gold dome of City Hall in San
Francisco. "I plead guilty. But, oh my God, never has it been more
important to be an activist."

His directive has national implications because 40 percent of all
touch-screen voting machines in use are in California. If vendors start
making equipment to the specifications of the huge California market, that
market is likely to dictate what is available to the rest of the country.

But Mr. Shelley's advocacy of paper trails has set off a fierce and
emotional reaction among local election officials in California and
elsewhere and has brought the purchase of such systems to a near
standstill. Nearly one third of voters nationwide this November will vote
on touch screens.

 Local officials say that despite demonstrations from computer experts that
hackers can break into the machines, there is no evidence that anyone has
done so. Moreover, voters may expect an actual, individual receipt after
they vote; what happens instead is that a paper record, visible to the
voter, is created in the machine. Officials have also expressed concern
about paper jams.

Mr. Shelley's insistence on paper trails has prompted officials in four
California counties to sue him. The clash is being repeated in other states
and courtrooms and has even roiled the venerable League of Women Voters,
where advocates of paper trails tried to overthrow the league's
establishment, which has been against them. They settled yesterday on a
compromise resolution to support "secure, accurate, recountable and
accessible" systems, all code words for paper trails.

Conny B. McCormack, the respected registrar of Los Angeles County, the
biggest voting jurisdiction in the country, has emerged as one of Mr.
Shelley's chief critics. Ms. McCormack said that Mr. Shelley had confounded
local officials by handing down directives that require a technology that
does not yet exist. Rather than inspire voter confidence, she said, Mr.
Shelley has undermined it.

 (Manufacturers have said that if the technology were required, they could
supply it, but not in time for the November elections.)

"He put out a report on April 20 saying that touch screens were 100 percent
accurate," Ms. McCormack said. "And then two days later he decertified
them." She said such actions had "destabilized the entire election process
in California and potentially nationwide."

In random testing during the March 2 California primary, Mr. Shelley's
office found that the machines "recorded the votes as cast with 100 percent
accuracy."

In an effort to prod the industry, Mr. Shelley yesterday issued standards
for the manufacturers in developing paper trails, the first in the country.
They include requirements that voters who are disabled be able to vote and
verify their vote without assistance, that voters be able to verify their
votes before casting them and that the paper records be printed in both
English and the voter's preferred language.

 "I'm insisting, quite unapologetically, on the need to have these
appropriate security measures in place to protect the voters, which is my
principal charge," Mr. Shelley said.

 Mr. Shelley, 48, grew up in politics, the son of Jack Shelley, a former
mayor of San Francisco. His father also served in Congress and the
California Legislature, where, he was one of two lawmakers to vote against
the internment of Japanese-Americans in World War II.

"My dad's vote seems like a no-brainer now," Mr. Shelley said. "But at the
time, it spoke to who he was and what he believed in, and he passed that on
to me." (Jack Shelley died of lung cancer in 1974, when his son was 18.)

Mr. Shelley began his career as a legislative director in Washington for
Representative Phil Burton, a liberal icon in California. He was elected to
the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and then the State Assembly, where
he served for the allowable limit of three two-year terms and became
majority leader.

He said he ran for secretary of state because he wanted to counteract the
decline in voting, though he has used the office to highlight other issues,
like domestic partner rights and corporate responsibility. Mr. Shelley did
not deny an interest in the governor's office someday but said his goal for
now was "to make policy and set precedent; it has nothing to do with my
future."

Eric Jaye, a political consultant here and longtime associate of Mr.
Shelley, said he had transformed what was essentially an administrative
post "into a bully pulpit."

Several recent analyses have bolstered Mr. Shelley's view that touch
screens need more security. These include a recommendation by the chairman
of the federal Election Assistance Commission that every voting
jurisdiction that uses touch screens enhance their security, with either
paper trails or other methods, by November.

 A joint report issued yesterday by the Kennedy School of Government at
Harvard and the National Science Foundation endorsed touch screens with
paper trails as the most effective voting system.

Still, many officials who run elections believe the push for paper trails
is more window-dressing than a necessary expense.

San Bernardino County, which is among those suing Mr. Shelley, plans to
ignore his directive to provide separate paper ballots for those
uncomfortable with touch screens. "It would be an expression of a lack of
confidence in the machines," for which the county just spent $14 million,
said David Wert, a spokesman for the county supervisors.

In May, the supervisors noted that Mr. Shelley had certified the county's
system before the March 2 primary and that "absolutely nothing has occurred
since that certification to call the system's performance or reliability
into question."

 To those who say he is only fanning fears, Mr. Shelley laughs.

"If a machine breaks down in San Diego, and it breaks down in Georgia, and
they break down in Maryland, and they break down in Alameda and we have
high schools where they can hack into the systems, the deficiencies are in
the machines," he said.

"Look," he added, "I believe these machines have a very, very firm place in
our future, but I also believe that in responding to the chaos in Florida
in 2000 these machines were rushed out before all the kinks were worked
out."


-- 
-----------------
R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah at ibuc.com>
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/>
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo at metzdowd.com