High hopes for unscrambling the vote

[Roy M. Silvernail]

Roy M. Silvernail wrote:
> R. A. Hettinga quotes Declan McCullagh:
> 
>>  Bottom line:The technology is still in its prototype stage--but a bigger
>> obstacle may be whether notoriously conservative voting officials can be
>> convinced to try something new.
> 
> 
> That's an interesting perspective, considering electronic voting already 
> *is* "something new".  A man with tinfoil inside his fez might wonder if 
> this points to a greater conspiracy that hinges on the lack of a paper 
> trail from the voting machines.
> 
> Speaking of which, this[1] Cringely column doesn't seem to have received 
> much notice, even though it points out that the Diebold machines 
> *already have a printer* built in.  While it's probably not equipped to 
> do Chaumian voter receipts, it could certainly do the old-fashioned 
> human-readable type.   That's a SMOP.

Sorry... left out the link.

[1] http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20040311.html
-- 
Roy M. Silvernail is roy at rant-central.com, and you're not
Never Forget:  It's Only 1's and 0's!
SpamAssassin->procmail->/dev/null->bliss
http://www.rant-central.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo at metzdowd.com