Open Source (was Simple SSL/TLS - Some Questions)

Bill Frantz frantz at pwpconsult.com
Fri Oct 10 00:55:37 EDT 2003


At 5:56 AM -0700 10/8/03, Peter Gutmann wrote:
>... it might be more
>useful to create a user-friendly management interface to IPsec implementations
>to join the zero or so already out there.  The difficulty in setting up any
>IPsec tunnel is what's been motivating the creation of (often insecure) non-
>IPsec VPN software, so what'd be a lot more helpful than (no offense, but) yet
>another SSL implementation is some means of making IPsec easier to use
>(although that may not be possible... OK, let's say "less painful to use" :-).

Given that the application I had which needed IPSec for encryption was
Voice over IP, I'd settle for a secure, point-to-point voice system which
works when both ends have NAT with appropriately configured firewalls.
Multi-point voice would be icing on the cake.

Cheers - Bill


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz        | "There's nothing so clear as a | Periwinkle
(408)356-8506      | vague idea you haven't written | 16345 Englewood Ave
www.pwpconsult.com | down yet." -- Dean Tribble     | Los Gatos, CA 95032


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo at metzdowd.com



More information about the cryptography mailing list