Simple SSL/TLS - Some Questions
Roy M. Silvernail
roy at rant-central.com
Fri Oct 3 14:56:54 EDT 2003
iang wrote:
>
> Jill Ramonsky wrote:
> > It's worth summing up the design goals here, so nobody gets confused.
> > Trouble is, I haven't figured out what they should all be. The main
> > point of confusion/contention right now seem to be (1) should it be in C
> > or C++?,
>
> C. And write C++ wrappers or let someone else do it.
Yes! Speaking from experience, it's far easier to write a C++ wrapper
for a C lib than the other way around. And as Ian said, it's probably
easier to get the implementation correct in C, at least as a first pass.
--
Roy M. Silvernail is roy at rant-central.com, and you're not
http://www.rant-central.com is the new scytale
Never Forget: It's Only 1's and 0's!
SpamAssassin->procmail->/dev/null->bliss
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo at metzdowd.com
More information about the cryptography
mailing list