Problems with GPG El Gamal signing keys?

[Steven M. Bellovin]

In message <00ea01c3b840$239179a0$5900a8c0 at p1038mobile>, "Anton Stiglic" writes
:
>
>By the way, is the paper by Phong Q. Nguyen describing the vulnerability
>available somewhere?  

This note appeared on the IETF OpenPGP mailing list.

--

Subject: Re: Removing Elgamal signatures
From: David Shaw <dshaw at jabberwocky.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 12:31:11 -0500
To: ietf-openpgp at imc.org


On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 08:46:25AM -0800, Hal Finney wrote:
> It would be good to see these results made available because they might
> turn out to be applicable to other types of keys that we might consider
> in the future.

The paper is as yet unpublished, but the author's web page with
contact info is http://www.di.ens.fr/~pnguyen/


		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo at metzdowd.com