Windows 2000 declared secure

[Adam Shostack]

On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 08:14:38PM -0600, Jim Hughes wrote:
| One Comment....
| 
| On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 16:48, Adam Shostack wrote:
| 
| > Actually, I think it is.  I don't think that Linux would pass EAL4; as
| > you've pointed out, that requires a documented and followed QA
| > process.  Would any of the BSDs?  (I know NAILabs has done stuff on
| > FreeBSD, but I'm not sure where it stands.)  How does SELinux stack up
| > here?
| 
| How about Mac OX-X  ---- GO APPLE! Yea!

Is MacOS X EAL4?


-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume



---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo at wasabisystems.com