building a true RNG (was: Quantum Computing ...)
David Honig
dahonig at cox.net
Tue Jul 23 15:31:35 EDT 2002
At 10:59 PM 7/22/02 -0700, jamesd at echeque.com wrote:
>Entropy is not quite a physical quantity -- rather it is on the
>slippery edge between being a physical thing and a philosophical
>thing. If you are not careful, you will slip into a deep epistemic
>bog and find yourself needing to ask "how do we know what is
>knowable, and what is the whichness of why?"
>
>To avoid such deep waters, know where your entropy is coming from.
We agree on your substantive points re RNGs, I think, but you're
interestingly wrong here. Entropy is a physical quantity,
it even figures into chemistry. The physics-of-computation people
(Bennett? Landaur? etc) have written about thermodynamics & information.
Modulo Chaitin-type mindgames about measuring it :-)
Anyway we're cryptographers, not philosophers, so we should be safe..
"Four wheeling through the epistemological bog" with Shannon as copilot
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo at wasabisystems.com
More information about the cryptography
mailing list