DOS attack on WPA 802.11?
Arnold G. Reinhold
reinhold at world.std.com
Thu Dec 5 12:40:18 EST 2002
At 10:48 PM -0500 11/29/02, Donald Eastlake 3rd wrote:
>Arnold,
>
>If you want to play with this as in intellectual exercise, be my guest.
>But the probability of changing the underlying IEEE 802.11i draft
>standard, which would take a 3/4 majority of the voting members of IEEE
>802.11, or of making the WiFi Alliance WPA profiling and subseting of
>802.11i incompatible with the standard, are close to zero.
>
Cryptographic standards should be judged on their merits, not on the
bureaucratic difficulties in changing them. Specs have been amended
before. Even NSA was willing to revise its original secure hash
standard. That's why we have SHA1. If I am right and WPA needlessly
introduces a significant denial of service vulnerability, then it
should be fixed. If I am wrong, no change is needed of course.
Check out the President's message for September 202 at the
Association of Old Crows web site ("Serving the Electronic Warfare
and Information Operations Community"): http://www.aochq.org/news.htm
Arnold Reinhold
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo at wasabisystems.com
More information about the cryptography
mailing list