Schneier on Bernstein factoring machine

[Russell Nelson]

Derek Atkins writes:
 > Russell Nelson <nelson at crynwr.com> writes:
 > 
 > > The union of the two sets of "cryptography users" and "paranoid
 > > people" is necessarily non-empty.  Who would bother to use
 > > cryptography sans a threat model?  And if you've got a non-empty
 > > threat model, then by definition you're paranoid.
 > 
 > I think it's really about degree.  I don't agree that having a
 > non-empty threat model implies you a paranoid.

Yes, you're right (and Phil Pennock points out that I meant
"intersection", not "union").  Dictionary.com defines paranoia as
"Extreme, irrational distrust of others."  I'm not using the correct
word here (nor are other people), because there are rational reasons
to distrust nosyparkers.  So what *is* the right word for having a
non-empty threat model for moderate and rational reasons?

-- 
-russ nelson              http://russnelson.com | Economic ignoramuses find
Crynwr sells support for free software  | PGPok | economics easy to criticize,
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | because none of it makes
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  | +1 315 268 9201 FAX   | any sense to them!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo at wasabisystems.com