Surge of New Technologies Erodes U.S. Edge in Spying

Thu Sep 20 09:02:20 EDT 2001

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/20/national/20SPY.html?todaysheadlines

September 20, 2001

THE ESPIONAGE BUSINESS

By WILLIAM J. BROAD

or decades, the United States used its technical expertise to gather
electronic signals and eavesdrop on the intimate conversations of its
adversaries, including Kremlin leaders in their limousines. Fleets of
satellites blanketed the globe, overhearing all manner of signals, messages
and conversations, day and night.

But the experts say the rapid growth of commercially available technologies
is fast eroding the government's edge. New computer power gives wide access
to unbreakable or virtually unbreakable codes. Fiber-optic lines give off
no electronic emanations that can be gathered. Even radio waves, the spy's
best friend, are evading capture as radios hop frequencies almost randomly
to outwit eavesdroppers.

The nation's declining ability to listen surreptitiously to global
communications may turn out to have been a major reason there was little or
no warning of hijackers intent on turning commercial jets into flying
bombs, security experts say.

To be sure, they add, the communications revolution also offers new
opportunities for spying, like snooping on cellphones. And Washington has
embarked on an aggressive if quiet campaign to research, design and acquire
equipment to sharpen its espionage edge.

But on balance, experts say, the intelligence losses outweigh the gains and
will for some time.

"The government is trying to close the barn door," said Angelo M.
Codevilla, a professor of international relations at Boston University who
was on the staff of the Senate intelligence committee for eight years. "The
horse left a long time ago. And it's not coming back."

A longtime federal official whose work relies on the fruits of technical
espionage agreed.

"It's getting harder each year to pick up what we need," the official said.
"Our potential adversaries are on the verge of denying access."

Moreover, intelligence experts say, the government is short of seasoned
analysts and new ones lack such essential skills as knowledge of foreign
languages. Also, they say, while infiltration is theoretically the best
approach to terrorist cells, in practice it is often impossible to achieve,
especially among zealots intent on martyrdom.

In the last few years, federal officials have pleaded on Capitol Hill for
legislative and financial aid to confront the new challenges.

For example, in testimony before the Senate intelligence committee, Louis
J. Freeh, who was then the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
cited encryption technology used by Ramzi Ahmed Yousef, the mastermind of
the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, who was captured in 1995. Mr. Freeh
said that when the authorities seized Mr. Yousef's laptop computer, they
found that it held information on a terrorist plot to blow up 11
American-owned airliners and that some of the files were encrypted.

This year, the push for more money produced a surge in federal spending,
especially for the National Security Agency, which runs Washington's
efforts to gather and decrypt global signals, though no figures have been
made public.

But some experts say money, even large amounts, will not be enough.

"It seems improbable that the N.S.A. would ever recover the full margin of
technology advantage," said Steven Aftergood, an intelligence expert at the
Federation of American Scientists, a private group in Washington.

There are also privacy and civil rights issues. Michael P. Harden, a
security expert who teaches computer ethics at the University of Maryland,
said that the horror of last week's attacks would fuel public support for
more government intrusion but that that would be difficult.

Judy Emmel, director of public affairs for the National Security Agency,
said the agency would not comment on its intelligence capabilities or their
bearing on the terror attacks, beyond saying that Lt. Gen. Michael V.
Hayden of the Air Force, the agency's director, has said it is as good as
ever.

The United States military and national security agencies pioneered the
fundamental computer science and electronic technology behind the
government's cold war spy efforts. They made and lofted satellites that
orbit 22,300 miles above the Equator, moving along with the rotating Earth
to remain motionless relative to the ground. These "ears" scoop up
electronic signals, including those from radar, radio, walkie-talkies and
long- distance telephones.

But their targets are vanishing. Relay stations on the ground for
commercial communication satellites and terrestrial microwave links have
increasingly been replaced by fiber-optic lines, which are impossible to
tap without a physical linkup.

Commercially available cryptography software often makes obtainable signals
unreadable, or greatly increases the time it takes to decipher them. For a
time, Washington fought the spread of such technology, refusing to grant
export licenses. But in 1999, as companies abroad made cryptography strides
and American industry pressured Washington, the Clinton administration
announced plans to relax restrictions on exports of data-scrambling
software.

A final barrier is the rising sophistication of radios. Those that hop
frequencies,a technique known as spread spectrum developed by the military
to dodge jamming, are nearly impossible to track and are now available in
many models.

"You and I can buy the equipment very easily," said Steve F. Russell, an
electrical engineer at Iowa State University who specializes in
communications security. "Many companies market it around the world."

On Sept. 10, the day before the terror strikes, Federal Computer Week, an
industry publication, reported that the National Security Agency was on a
15-year multibillion-dollar effort "to modernize the nation's cryptographic
systems."

Now, though, some experts endorse old-fashioned methods. Robert Morris, a
former chief scientist at the security agency, argues that intelligence
agencies can make more use of of the three B's method: burglary, bribery
and blackmail.
Home | Back to National | Search | Help 	Back to Top

Click Here to Receive 50% Off Home Delivery of The New York Times Newspaper.

Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company | Privacy Information
-- 
-----------------
R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah at ibuc.com>
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/>
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo at wasabisystems.com