Rijndael in Assembler for x86?

jamesd at echeque.com jamesd at echeque.com
Sat Sep 15 10:48:33 EDT 2001


    --
 Perry E. Metzger <perry at piermont.com> wrote:
> >Because it is typically slower by many times than hand
> >tuned assembler.

On 14 Sep 2001, at 14:24, Ian Goldberg wrote:
> Are you sure?  For general code, that certainly hasn't been
> true in a long time; optimizing compilers nowadays can
> often do *better* then hand-coded assembler.

So say compiler writers.

I have not found this to be true.  Perhaps it is true of some
compilers and some people's assembler, and some code.

    --digsig
         James A. Donald
     6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
     R+xhXGtvscaNbOpfLSnwjeziDpDOv2XtF4/h1ST9
     4Haf1Gw4kSOsLRysU1Atpc78QFbNBjP0Dr0J4Ji3I




---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo at wasabisystems.com




More information about the cryptography mailing list