Thawte Protects The World From Crypto (was Re: [ Slashdot Message ] Daily Stories)
Bram Cohen
bram at gawth.com
Tue Oct 30 12:15:00 EST 2001
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Peter Gutmann wrote:
> As was mentioned on the Slashdot debate, this has nothing to do with crypto but
> is for AuthentiCode signing certs. Blaming this move in terrorists therefore
> makes it even more bizarre. According to Thawte (via Slashdot), they were just
> following orders from Verisign. The only explanation I can think of is that
> it's some attempt by MS to further lock small developers out of XP/.NET
> (alongside charging $1K/year for developers and similar things), but that's
> pretty far-fetched.
Not all that far-fetched, mostly I'm not sure microsoft has that much
influence on verisign.
I'd say the most likely explanations are (a) that verisign intends to
change a lot more for a related service which that one would undercut or
(b) the division was losing money so they just canned it. I'm cynical
enough to guess (b)
In any case, it's a safe bet that blaming it on the WTC attacks is
bullshit.
-Bram Cohen
"Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent"
-- John Maynard Keynes
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo at wasabisystems.com
More information about the cryptography
mailing list