non-repudiation, was Re: crypto flaw in secure mail standards
Lynn.Wheeler at firstdata.com
Lynn.Wheeler at firstdata.com
Sat Jul 7 15:38:14 EDT 2001
... and the x9.59 solution was designed to be applicable to "all"
account-based, electronic payments .... not just credit ... but "all".
much of the regs. are specific to credit (because of the ease that
account-number harvesting can lead to fraudulent, non-authenticated
transactions) ... while the x9.59 approach can not only be used to address
credit but debit as well (one of the other account-based, electronic
payments).
an example is the completed nacha pilot
again refs at
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo at wasabisystems.com
More information about the cryptography
mailing list