<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On 20 Mar 2018, at 11:52, Henry Baker <<a href="mailto:hbaker1@pipeline.com" class="">hbaker1@pipeline.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class="">Someone has claimed to me that RISC V completely "solves" the Spectre problem.<br class=""><br class="">I'm still dubious. Perhaps it is a derivative/modification of RISC V ?<br class=""><br class="">Is there any in-depth analysis of RISC V & Spectre online somewhere?<br class=""></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""><div class="">Eben Upton did a blog post on why it doesn’t affect the RaspberryPI</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><a href="https://www.raspberrypi.org/blog/why-raspberry-pi-isnt-vulnerable-to-spectre-or-meltdown/" class="">https://www.raspberrypi.org/blog/why-raspberry-pi-isnt-vulnerable-to-spectre-or-meltdown/</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>f</div></body></html>