<div dir="ltr">Much hype exists around DAG (<span style="color:rgb(84,84,84);font-family:Roboto,arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline">directed acyclic graph) in some parts, as an improvement on blockchain crypto because, for one thing, it does away with mining. However isn't mining the thing that incentivizes increased computing power to verify the blockchain and protect against a 51% attack?  Would DAGs be less secure against attackers with lots of computing power *because* there is no mining?</span><div><span style="color:rgb(84,84,84);font-family:Roboto,arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:left;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline"><br></span></div><div><font color="#545454" face="Roboto, arial, sans-serif">Thanks</font></div></div>