<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>On 10/2/2017 11:05 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:<br>
    </p>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAMm+Lwg34CURjdwij8NCSRt6mvNw806BbpUDKPJsakq_OGz9xg@mail.gmail.com">
      <div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">So I was
        working on my UDF fingerprint scheme. Using base32 to encode a
        fingerprint and adding an 8 byte version prefix means that a
        fingerprint with a 117 bit work factor looks like this:</div>
      <div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><span
          style="font-family:"Noto
          Sans",Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:14px">MDDK7-N6A72-7AJZN-OSTRX-XKS72</span><br>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><span
          style="font-family:"Noto
          Sans",Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:14px"><br>
        </span></div>
      <div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><span
          style="font-family:"Noto
          Sans",Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:14px">Its not
          bad but how about we ease up on the work factor. The absolute
          minimum I would want to have is 92 bits.</span></div>
      <div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><span
          style="font-family:"Noto
          Sans",Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:14px"><br>
        </span></div>
      <div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><span
          style="font-family:"Noto
          Sans",Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:14px">Now
          suppose that the first 25 bits of the fingerprint are zeros. </span><span
          style="font-family:"Noto
          Sans",Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:14px">The 92
          bit fingerprint that would look like this:</span></div>
      <div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><span
          style="font-family:"Noto
          Sans",Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:14px"><br>
        </span></div>
      <div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><span
          style="font-family:"Noto
          Sans",Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:14px">MAAAA-AB3VV-FOFE2-CLRWJ </span><span
          style="font-family:"Noto
          Sans",Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:14px"><br>
        </span></div>
      <div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><span
          style="font-family:"Noto
          Sans",Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:14px"><br>
        </span></div>
      <div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><span
          style="font-family:"Noto
          Sans",Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:14px">Now
          looks like this:</span></div>
      <div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><span
          style="font-family:"Noto
          Sans",Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:14px"><br>
        </span></div>
      <div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><span
          style="font-family:"Noto
          Sans",Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:14px">MF3VV-FOFE2-CLRWJ </span><span
          style="font-family:"Noto
          Sans",Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:14px"><br>
        </span></div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Both the idea and the implementation are very close to the "call
    signs" system that I worked on with Kim Cameron and Josh Benaloh.
    Too bad that we failed to publish an academic paper, and that the
    best description is in the patent --
    <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.google.com.au/patents/US7929689">https://www.google.com.au/patents/US7929689</a>.<br>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Christian Huitema</pre>
  </body>
</html>