<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Am 05.04.2017 um 20:59 schrieb Allen:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">A Faraday cage
does not emit radio frequency energy, and therefore
<br>
it does not "interfere" with radio communication.
<br>
</blockquote>
47 USC 333, states that "No PERSON shall willfully or
maliciously interfere with or cause
<br>
interfearence to .......", not "No DEVICE shall......."
<br>
<br>
Via building a Farady cage, a person ..... causes interference
to ......,
<br>
right?
<br>
</blockquote>
No, as explained, the term "interfere" as used in that section of
the
<br>
US Code requires the emission of radio frequency energy.
<br>
</blockquote>
You considered another law than I do. It's possible that differet
laws use the same
<br>
word but mean different things due to different contexts or
definitions in them.
<br>
<br>
M. K. Shen
</body>
</html>