<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><br><div><div>On Feb 25, 2016, at 4:49 PM, Matthias Wulfeck <<a href="mailto:matthias.wulfeck@gmail.com">matthias.wulfeck@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div>> "Do you want the government to have free access to your phone"?<span style="font-weight:bold"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-weight:bold"><br></span></div>> "I don't have anything to hide. They can look at they want."<div><span style="font-weight:bold"><br></span></div>I'm sure many of us who have tried to explain the backdoor problem to their friends and family have heard this response to the question <div><br></div><div><div>Part of building support for Apple and fighting the backdoor is a grass roots effort to educate our friends of the real risk here (as we see them).<br></div><div><br></div><div>I figure I would toss this question out and seek advice from the general community. How do you respond to "I don't have anything to hide"? How do you explain to non-technical (and non-paranoid) friends of what's really at stake?</div></div></div></blockquote><br></div><div>I usually say: maybe the government is trustworthy *now* but how do you know it will still be trustworthy tomorrow? (Nowadays I sometimes add, “or after the next election?”)</div><div><br></div><div>Then I point them to this book:</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00505UZ4G/">http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00505UZ4G/</a></div><div><br></div><div>rg</div><div><br></div></body></html>