<html>
<body>
Cryptome does not pretend to provide illusory security, that is
security.<br>
It is a vile, rotten, corrupt endeavor, like life. Chuckle.<br><br>
Visitors, readers, consumers must be skeptical of security, and not
rely<br>
upon security promoters, their followers and investors who exploit <br>
dependency by fear uncertainty and doubt. <br><br>
Skepticism of security claims and methods is one of the purposes of <br>
these lists. Perhaps the main purpose, although it is commonplace
for<br>
these lists to be used for soliciting befuddled consumers to hop
aboard<br>
the gravy train. Now and then skeptcism of the security arises but is
usually<br>
suppressed during times of crisis when incentive is rich to promote
poor<br>
products and services. Governments, commerce, orgs, experts
cooperate<br>
to foster crises under guise of opposition.<br><br>
This applies to all forms of security, safety, protection, defense,
hygienic<br>
pharma. <br><br>
Still, Cryptome endorses the continuing struggle to improve citizen<br>
protection, not only as a job, career, industry, but as citizens'
obligation <br>
to bear responsibility for the commonweal against its inside and outside
<br>
enemies, if you will, common math against the deadly germs.<br><br>
One way to do that is to not oversell it, tone down the threats,
reduce<br>
drumbeating, avoid hyperbole for and against, forego advertising,<br>
gang-bang hectoring, circle jerk conferencing, TEDing, prize
bestowing,<br>
to quietly invent, improve, critique, test, apply, re-test often, expect
to<br>
be deceived by colleagues witting or unwitting, especially by sales,<br>
politicians, authoritarians -- the persistent germs.<br><br>
<br><br>
<br>
At 02:50 AM 12/30/2014, you wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">john likes to be poetic as a
wall - dear john please listen to the smart people and have a small bit
of humility - it will make you better at your job and we need EVERYONE to
step up and be better at their jobs <br><br>
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 7:38 AM, grarpamp
<<a href="mailto:grarpamp@gmail.com">grarpamp@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
<dl>
<dd>On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 8:20 AM, John Young
<<a href="mailto:jya@pipeline.com">jya@pipeline.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
<dd>> Hash this motherfucker, said math to germ.<br><br>
<dd>JYA, you, as the original publisher of various and valued
datasets...<br>
<dd>the responsibility to calculate, sign, and publish said hashes rests
with<br>
<dd>you alone. Please consult with any trusted parties should you
need<br>
<dd>assistance in such matters. A future of archivers, disseminators,
and<br>
<dd>analysts will thank you.<br><br>
</dl><br><br>
<br>
-- <br>
Cari Machet<br>
NYC 646-436-7795<br>
<a href="mailto:carimachet@gmail.com">carimachet@gmail.com</a><br>
AIM carismachet<br>
Syria +963-099 277 3243<br>
Amman +962 077 636 9407<br>
Berlin +49 152 11779219 <br>
Reykjavik +354 894 8650<br>
Twitter: @carimachet
<<a href="https://twitter.com/carimachet">
https://twitter.com/carimachet</a>><br><br>
7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187<br><br>
Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the <br>
addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the
<br>
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this <br>
information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email
without <br>
permission is strictly prohibited.<br><br>
</blockquote></body>
</html>