<div dir="ltr">Looking at all the coverage of this paper, I was reminded of this comic:<div><br></div><div><a href="https://i.imgur.com/IfKGuX5.jpg">https://i.imgur.com/IfKGuX5.jpg</a><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra">

<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Jerry Leichter <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:leichter@lrw.com" target="_blank">leichter@lrw.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

I can't figure out from these two articles exactly what's been attacked.  (It's not even clear to me if they are describing two *different* attacks.)  Anyone been following the details?<br>
<br>
<a href="http://phys.org/news/2014-05-unassailable-encryption-algorithm-hours.html" target="_blank">http://phys.org/news/2014-05-unassailable-encryption-algorithm-hours.html</a><br>
<br>
<a href="http://phys.org/news/2014-05-algorithm-cryptography.html" target="_blank">http://phys.org/news/2014-05-algorithm-cryptography.html</a><br>
<br>
                                                        -- Jerry<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
The cryptography mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cryptography@metzdowd.com">cryptography@metzdowd.com</a><br>
<a href="http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography" target="_blank">http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Tony Arcieri<br>
</div>