<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><div>On Oct 25, 2013, at 5:35 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: Courier; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; "><div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div class="WordSection1" style="page: WordSection1; "><div style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">Anyone thought of using mailinator?<o:p></o:p></div></div></div></span></blockquote>I've used it ... but what purposes do you have in mind? If you're thinking of using it as a quick way to quickly implement the "encrypt and broadcast to everyone" anonymous mail system ... it would quickly collapse. The description of mailinator says that it's purely an in-memory system, with limited capacity. For its intended usage - mail addresses where you just need something that will receive mail, you never intend to read it; or where there is one message - e.g., a confirmation of sign-up that you will grab and respond to within minutes, and then never care about again - that's fine. When memory fills, older messages are discarded - at this point, after "a few hours". There are already protections against too much crud being received - attachments are discarded, there's a size limit.</div><div><br></div><div>Did you have something else in mind?</div><div><div> -- Jerry</div><div><br></div></div></body></html>