[Cryptography] [FORGED] Re: Speculation considered harmful?

Peter Gutmann pgut001 at cs.auckland.ac.nz
Fri Jan 5 19:52:33 EST 2018


Nico Williams <nico at cryptonector.com> writes:
>On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 08:32:32PM -0800, Tony Arcieri wrote:
>> The "swarm of puny cores" approach is a bad fit for a lot of problem
>> domains, so I'm curious to see if RISC-V implementations can evolve into
>> something a bit closer to what we'd use for typical "business logic"-heavy
>> server workloads.
>
>It's very good for many cloud workloads that are inherently horizontally
>scalable.  

It's actually a pretty poor fit for almost anything.  I think you're failing
to appreciate just how puny these cores (and their associated infrastructure)
really are.

If you do happen to have an embarrassingly parallel job, nVidia (or more
generally GPGPUs) have had the hardware for that for years now.

Peter.


More information about the cryptography mailing list