[Cryptography] Regulations of Tempest protections of buildings
Charles Jackson
clj at jacksons.net
Wed Apr 5 18:14:47 EDT 2017
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Jerry Leichter <leichter at lrw.com> wrote:
> Could some enterprising lawyer try to make the case that "interfere"
> encompasses this kind of activity? Sure - we've seen enterprising lawyers
> do much worse. Generally they don't succeed - courts are not that stupid.
Definition from FCC Rules 47 CFR Section 2.1
Interference.* The effect of unwanted energy *due to one or a combination
of emissions, radiations, or inductions upon reception in a
radiocommunication system, manifested by any performance degradation,
misinterpretation, or loss of information which could be extracted in the
absence of such unwanted energy. (RR)
Emphasis added
--
Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20170405/8aae1e7e/attachment.html>
More information about the cryptography
mailing list