[Cryptography] Text of Burr-Feinstein encryption backdoor bill

John-Mark Gurney jmg at funkthat.com
Sun Apr 10 16:40:56 EDT 2016


Donald Eastlake wrote this message on Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 16:26 -0400:
> by implication lawfully so ordered. It doesn't say your "appropriate
> technical assistance" has to succeed in providing access to encrypted
> data. It doesn't stop you from appealing and trying to get the court
> order invalidated. It's all just a feel good no-op.

The law doesn't prevent the gov't from requiring someone to develope a
backdoor in the client (that can exfiltrate all data) and forcing the
company/owner/publisher from giving it to all in order to get the data
requested...

-- 
  John-Mark Gurney				Voice: +1 415 225 5579

     "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."


More information about the cryptography mailing list