[Cryptography] traffic analysis
Richard Outerbridge
outer at sympatico.ca
Thu Jan 29 20:35:25 EST 2015
On 2015-01-29 (29), at 11:22:14, ianG <iang at iang.org> wrote:
[….]
>> Which as we all know is pretty much impossible.
>
> That I don't follow.
>
> iang
>
Maybe things have changed. I’ve always thought in principle
it is impossible to achieve insignificant (for some epsilon
of significance) levels of false positives & false negatives
at the same time with the same level of insignificance. No?
__outer
More information about the cryptography
mailing list