[Cryptography] Juniper & Dual_EC_DRBG
John Young
jya at pipeline.com
Thu Dec 24 16:16:31 EST 2015
There are two versions of the doc Jake cited, differently redacted:
https://cryptome.org/2013/09/nsa-sigint-enabling-nyt-13-0905.pdf (one
Jake cited)
https://cryptome.org/2013/09/nsa-sigint-enabling-guardian-13-0905.pdf (another)
A comparison of excerpts of the two versions cited:
https://cryptome.org/crypto-chips.jpg
At 02:04 PM 12/24/2015, you wrote:
>On 24/12/15 04:21, Jacob Appelbaum wrote: > I think you're on the
>right path here. It makes sense from what we've > published about
>their VPN decrypt capabilities. I think that anywhere > there is
>Cavium, we'll find a "SIGINT enabled" VPN. Cavium is > repeatedly
>mentioned in the archive and in documents. I distinctly remember the
>'SIGINT Enabling' document which was published. It featured the
>following redaction, which I found very odd: (TS//SI//REL TO USA,
>FVEY) Complete enabling for [?????????] encryption chips used in
>Virtual Private Network and Web encryption devices. [CCP_00009] Can
>you confirm if this redaction was referring to Cavium? Or if you are
>referring to some other document, can you point me towards it? Or
>are these unpublished documents?
>_______________________________________________ The cryptography
>mailing list cryptography at metzdowd.com
>http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
More information about the cryptography
mailing list