[Cryptography] Google proposes a Web of Trust replacement to solve the key distribution problem.

[Josh J]

> Some of this is addressed in the comments at the URL I posted, e.g
by listing a hash of the email address instead of the address itself.

Why does a hash protect privacy ? I'll just hash the well known email
address which was revealed by auxiliary information and then track
udhay at pobox.com

On Friday, August 29, 2014, Udhay Shankar N <udhay at pobox.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Phil Pennock
> <md-cryptography at spodhuis.org <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > So take that same principle, but then make the history absolutely
> > immutable by design, while holding data about personally identifiable
> > information (name + email), make it very public, with complete history
> > (not just current view) and try to scale it out to every email user.
> >
> > Spammers will have a field day.
>
> Some of this is addressed in the comments at the URL I posted, e.g by
> listing a hash of the email address instead of the address itself.
>
> Udhay
> _______________________________________________
> The cryptography mailing list
> cryptography at metzdowd.com <javascript:;>
> http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20140829/37f34c63/attachment.html>