[Cryptography] Statements from ANSI and ISO on Dual_EC_DRBG?

[Joachim Strömbergson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Aloha!

Has anybody seen any official comments from ANSI and ISO on
Dual_EC_DRBG? Since NIST announced on September 9, 2013 that they
strongly recommended against using Dual_EC_DRBG it would be interesting
to see the reaction and recommendations from ANSI and ISO.


ANSI standardized Dual_EC_DRBG in ANS X9.82. The latest version seems to
be from 2007.
http://webstore.ansi.org/RecordDetail.aspx?sku=ANSI+X9.82%3a+Part+3+-2007 (paywall)


ISO standardized Dual_EC_DRBG in ISO/IEC 18031. The latest version seems
to be from 2011.
http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=54945 (paywall)

Standards and paywalls...

- -- 
Med vänlig hälsning, Yours

Joachim Strömbergson - Alltid i harmonisk svängning.
========================================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTQlaVAAoJEF3cfFQkIuyN4eoQAJqiMr2UHKfanK8k2lf+yR83
Mva51ELKD5ZZbXbC8Cw27os6VZK+VZAf9qnXBbLCvJXubJfZgXy1jEw6V+1vZ6Hf
pF5mk/R2qvU1T4qjEBul/hA3cxQ3nnNvpseX0r8zft2+lMFYHQi0tocFWP1NmCt/
F9D3eePXC7tB7WUYEYlOCO3uipnhHLI9pXgDz4Q0fwsKxEDCk6vf73pOl1/Xvgxo
x+t0YeRZPkjatIWbHuEH46Hahz0aGtcp7C3qMbDF8+D3Xzyv53/LdRk14Ko166yf
aZ5vkJI9rEhU4hgBotDwOUATPhxj+VFMOtGYoL0q6oT/gNhjOkQ3Bh79c98QS30Y
XFs91+Nl4ACWQW0K91qHnNiOYk/9CQ82jCjzShrGPGicwnsvTzI+ISyj+XAYdBpx
Xnx8BIUpeBsHzUEvPtKKZee3lwqzyAy2Jwz6jK6N+yoLhj55T8DwbS0NSV8YYSbQ
pLoDUu0mFVNRmj4A8F5nyJilUoJzEw1O7G2DLmtpPwuECtMt6QBSY+uDNFNKg9aV
iBBluyMrHVZfz7CYPA6CCPFD52+9Dqh49qy2tlELYYO9bs6vmD9pt/L4x7OcBZtc
nLG8tuDnjSwVlOZi/2mL2Yho0aWitN26cATPDgJTGt51hR2VD4Al9MmJOGSVF5b+
d0h0d9QO5+c1zFM4f/5R
=mMvS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----